1. These three approaches have been introduced as
“progressive” but have been around for years in Europe. In the U.S. what is
considered “traditional” ECE and how have these programs been integrated into
US education?
There are three approaches that the article states
that are Waldorf, Montessori and Reggio. As you can see according to the
European teaching have know to be a progressive teaching. So that is something
that is always being improved. Then we have the United States who has used
these teachings as traditional guidelines. Through these types of approaches
America has been able to promote and encourage children through reading,
literacy, and math. From these types of programs that the Unites States has
integrated to the education. You can see that it is used in a lot of the
different teaching styles. It helped to improve on a lot of educators to
improve in the formative methods. Through this we are able to be able to work
with the children to impact on their learning.
2. Compare the three programs in terms of teacher role and assessment
discussing which YOU feel would benefit children in the US. Explain WHY you
favor certain aspects of each programs and/or WHY it would not work
Looking at the three programs and the roles that the teachers need to
model for the children it seems that when you are looking at the styles to be
difficult to do because of the fact the through the ECE classes you learn to
develop a lot of skills from each one. But looking at it the one that I have
the hardest time understanding the most would most likely be Waldorf. I like
the fact that it is an all-natural program and that through it the child is
able to expand on their own kind of independent learning through creativity and
imagination. It was always strange to me how they have dolls with no faces but
I really enjoy that they have natural lighting and that the classroom is too.
Then there was Montessori that allows independent leaning through self-directed
learning which I think is amazing because allowing children to be able to learn
through their own needs is a great way for children to learn. Lastly, we have
Reggio where there is learning through natural and environmental engagement for
children. Which I think is really cool because being able to allow children to
learn through the things that are around them is something that doesn’t happen
often. To be able to use the community for children to learn off of is
something that doesn’t only just interest me but its something that is
naturally great. For me if I was to be able to have a teaching style it would
most likely be leaning towards is towards Montessori and Reggio because of the
fact that it is based off the learning of the children. Isn’t that what we when
we teach children. I think tat these are the two learning styles that I find
myself doing a lot of in my own classroom because a lot of the activities that
I plan for my children is always based off the interest of the children and the
things that they are interested in we try our best to get the children involved
in their community and learn off of their surroundings.
I find that it is great that you are able to pull from the different styles or approaches of teaching. Here at our site, we have the traditional learning centers and our students are able to choose freely through out the time frame. But also like you, I believe we take a little bit from every approach and incorporate it in our planning, in creating our classroom environment and also through assessments. What types of assessments do you use or you would like to use while working with children?
ReplyDeleteHi Jasmine,
ReplyDeleteWhen thinking about "traditional" teaching, think about classrooms that use Direct Instructional methods to teach, where the teacher is the head of the class filling the children's head with knowledge. How do these 3 programs compare against that? The role of the teacher in these 3 programs is certainly different than being the one with all of the knowledge that needs to feed it to the children. Do you think it's possible to use more aspects of these 3 programs in our classrooms? What would you say to parents who had a hard time understanding why you were adapting the different aspects of these programs into your classroom?
I added two articles to Laulima; one is about the lack of joy in today's classrooms and one is about parents who have decided to have their children opt out of standardized testing. How do you think "joy" applies to these 3 classrooms? When we look at traditional learning here in the US, how does "joy" play a role? How important do you think joy of learning is when discussing early childhood learning? How can we bring it back to the forefront of our teaching? Thanks!