Sunday, March 1, 2015

Three Approaches

1. These three approaches have been introduced as “progressive” but have been around for years in Europe. In the U.S. what is considered “traditional” ECE and how have these programs been integrated into US education?

There are three approaches that the article states that are Waldorf, Montessori and Reggio. As you can see according to the European teaching have know to be a progressive teaching. So that is something that is always being improved. Then we have the United States who has used these teachings as traditional guidelines. Through these types of approaches America has been able to promote and encourage children through reading, literacy, and math. From these types of programs that the Unites States has integrated to the education. You can see that it is used in a lot of the different teaching styles. It helped to improve on a lot of educators to improve in the formative methods. Through this we are able to be able to work with the children to impact on their learning.

2. Compare the three programs in terms of teacher role and assessment discussing which YOU feel would benefit children in the US. Explain WHY you favor certain aspects of each programs and/or WHY it would not work


Looking at the three programs and the roles that the teachers need to model for the children it seems that when you are looking at the styles to be difficult to do because of the fact the through the ECE classes you learn to develop a lot of skills from each one. But looking at it the one that I have the hardest time understanding the most would most likely be Waldorf. I like the fact that it is an all-natural program and that through it the child is able to expand on their own kind of independent learning through creativity and imagination. It was always strange to me how they have dolls with no faces but I really enjoy that they have natural lighting and that the classroom is too. Then there was Montessori that allows independent leaning through self-directed learning which I think is amazing because allowing children to be able to learn through their own needs is a great way for children to learn. Lastly, we have Reggio where there is learning through natural and environmental engagement for children. Which I think is really cool because being able to allow children to learn through the things that are around them is something that doesn’t happen often. To be able to use the community for children to learn off of is something that doesn’t only just interest me but its something that is naturally great. For me if I was to be able to have a teaching style it would most likely be leaning towards is towards Montessori and Reggio because of the fact that it is based off the learning of the children. Isn’t that what we when we teach children. I think tat these are the two learning styles that I find myself doing a lot of in my own classroom because a lot of the activities that I plan for my children is always based off the interest of the children and the things that they are interested in we try our best to get the children involved in their community and learn off of their surroundings.

2 comments:

  1. I find that it is great that you are able to pull from the different styles or approaches of teaching. Here at our site, we have the traditional learning centers and our students are able to choose freely through out the time frame. But also like you, I believe we take a little bit from every approach and incorporate it in our planning, in creating our classroom environment and also through assessments. What types of assessments do you use or you would like to use while working with children?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Jasmine,

    When thinking about "traditional" teaching, think about classrooms that use Direct Instructional methods to teach, where the teacher is the head of the class filling the children's head with knowledge. How do these 3 programs compare against that? The role of the teacher in these 3 programs is certainly different than being the one with all of the knowledge that needs to feed it to the children. Do you think it's possible to use more aspects of these 3 programs in our classrooms? What would you say to parents who had a hard time understanding why you were adapting the different aspects of these programs into your classroom?

    I added two articles to Laulima; one is about the lack of joy in today's classrooms and one is about parents who have decided to have their children opt out of standardized testing. How do you think "joy" applies to these 3 classrooms? When we look at traditional learning here in the US, how does "joy" play a role? How important do you think joy of learning is when discussing early childhood learning? How can we bring it back to the forefront of our teaching? Thanks!

    ReplyDelete