1. Nimmo makes a case for the historical separation between adults and
children but cross-cultural research indicates that children learn and gain
identity by having engagement in “real life”. Bloch & Adler (me) and Reggio
Emilia examples. Discuss his position in the context of 2014.
While reading through the article you notice that the findings that
Nimmo states that children are being alienated from the adult society going
back to 1974. Where children were sent to “daycare” but when you are pulling
the child away from the environment that the parents are taking part in leaves
the child to excluded while the parents believe that they are shielding their
children from the world. This type of censorship towards child’s cuts down on
the culture and the environment that surrounds the child. He points out that
taking part of your child’s life is a very important role for not only the
teachers but also the family and parents too. From that it creates a strong
relationship and allowing the child to behave and gain an identity to form them.
Communicating and taking part of your child’s life is important because
it helps with their development and growth. So allowing your child to take part
in their culture or their environment then having to shield them.
2. How could the six elements proposed as
an alternative framework for research, analysis and practice be implemented in
childcare centers today?
In the article there are six elements that are proposed. From the
research provided childcare centers implementing and practicing these elements.
Intimacy is the first element and
what childcare centers can do is to be able to follow-up on the same affection
and care that parents provide for the child. To be able to maintain the care
for the child as well as, to be mindful when things are difficult. Continuity in the childcare centers is
to establish strong relationships with not only with the child but with the
families and being able to communicate among them too. Complexity is establishing and encouraging a playful environment
for children to explore and expand on their imagination and create an
atmosphere to promote children’s curiosity and interest. Identity is providing the
needs of all the children and being able to give them the support and the
encouragement to grow and develop through the interest and to be aware of the
certain needs of the children. Diversity is
giving the children different perspectives of culture of children in the
classroom or those who are interested in a certain culture and also looking into
the environment and the surrounding of where they live or where they go. Reciprocity is having high expectation
and desired outcomes for children and having programs guiding children is
important towards reaching their milestones and help work on the needs of the
child’s strength and weaknesses.
1. What are the pros and cons of parents and young children working
together on technology?
Now days the children of this generation are known to be the
technological age. So younger children are more interested in technology and
using technology. Pros of using these tools are that children are able to learn
and manipulate through a different way. That having technology for younger
children and having them exposed to technology you are able to open them up to
more then the environment around them and exposing them to a new perspective
and another form of explorations through the internet and exposing them to
different forms of a technique. From this it allows children to manipulate and
create more forms of technology that could lead to future innovations. Cons of
having children learn through technology that it becomes a self-taught program
allowing the child to intake too much information through the internet and that
too much exposure to technology can take effects towards the child development
and that if a child is spending too much time on technology it’s the abuse
towards the user if the user is using it towards video games and watching
senseless videos.
2. What is the concern about technology usage and DAP? Do you agree?
In accordance to DAP having technology can be isolating towards a
singular area that if technology isn’t being used for educational reasons that
it obstructs from growth and development. As you read through the article you
find that through technology that it has improved on communication and
experimentation. For me I agree that technology is a useful tool if it is being
used properly in the classroom and that there are guidelines to the technology
being used. As we continue to move forward with technology it is constantly
improving and becoming better where using technology as a teaching technique or
using it in the classroom to be very helpful. In our classroom we do use
technology in the classroom. Usually our class has been really interested in
different formations of building and how it is built, we already have in our
class pictures and books that provide the same information to build building
but it was also good to be able to allow the children to watch a video on what
tools they use, the different types of materials and watching how the building
is built through this our children were able to have an entire curriculum
dedicated on building because we were able to give a different perspective
instead of taking the children to see a building being built which we thought
might be a little dangerous to allowing us to use the video gave an alternative
to use. So I believe using technology is good because since it is something
that children will constantly come across in their lives that its good to
incorporate to their learning but then it still needs that supervision and
limits.
Hi Jasmine,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your thoughts. I agree with your pros and cons of parents and young children working together on technology. Technology for young children does open them up to more than just the environment around them. Experts say the same thing about books, that it gives children to opportunity to explore and visit places they never been to and it is a great way to build on their creativity and imagination.
But we do still need to supervise and monitor their use of computers and set boundaries and limits.
Hi Jasmine,
ReplyDeleteNimmo talks about how children should have more exposure to "real life" experiences, such as work that is performed by adults. For instance, he talks about how some Reggio programs have children engage in apprenticeships where they learn skills from a more knowledgeable adult. Do you think this is something that could or should happen more often? How does the idea of liability get in the way of exposing children to more "real life" activities? In what ways might you introduce "real life" activities in your classroom, and what might you say to the parents who were skeptical about the introduction of such activities?
You also highlight an important aspect about technology usage - that there is a difference between using technology thoughtfully versus thoughtlessly. The article highlighted ways in which parents and children worked together and built relationships while technology was only the means by which they did that. What lessons can we take from that example? Are there similar projects you could work on at your school? In terms of DAP, we discussed earlier in the semester about how it doesn't take into consideration a lot of different cultures' perspectives on child growth and development. And in Reggio Emilia programs, they consider children to be the "protagonists" of their own education. How does this perspective differ from our own here? Does DAP prevent us from seeing potential learning activities? How can we be mindful about the ways we are framing children's capabilities - in other words, how can we really know what children are capable of if we don't expose them to more challenging activities? What do you think? Thanks!